1972 DAF 66 vs. 2004 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 DAF 66 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden Rodeo (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (45 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 DAF 66 | 2004 Holden Rodeo | |
| Make | DAF | Holden |
| Model | 66 | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2405 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 75 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 3060 mm |
