1972 DAF 66 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 DAF 66 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (46 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 380 kg more than 1972 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (176 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1972 DAF 66 | 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | DAF | Mitsubishi |
Model | 66 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 46 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 75 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 826 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 50 L |