1972 DAF 66 vs. 2006 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 DAF 66 would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 380 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (45 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm) has 495 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 DAF 66 | 2006 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | DAF | Dodge |
| Model | 66 | Charger |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 6063 cc |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 425 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 75 Nm | 570 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 72 L |
