1972 DAF 66 vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 DAF 66 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 468 kg more than 1972 DAF 66.
Because 1972 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (184 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1972 DAF 66 | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 66 | 6 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 75 Nm | 184 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 83.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 826 kg | 1294 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 64 L |