1972 DAF 66 vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 DAF 66 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (45 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Challenger (250 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 DAF 66 | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | DAF | Dodge |
| Model | 66 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 3518 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 75 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 70 L |
