1972 DAF 66 vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 DAF 66 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (45 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66.
Because 1972 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Cube (127 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1972 DAF 66 | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
Make | DAF | Nissan |
Model | 66 | Cube |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 75 Nm | 127 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 82 L |