1972 DAF 66 vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 DAF 66 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1972 DAF 66. (46 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1972 DAF 66.
Because 1972 DAF 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 DAF 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 DAF 66. (75 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
1972 DAF 66 | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | DAF | Holden |
Model | 66 | Epica |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1106 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 46 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 75 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |