1972 Dodge Challenger vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1972 Dodge Challenger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 615 kg more than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 1972 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Challenger | 1967 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Challenger | Fronte |
Year Released | 1972 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2250 mm |