1972 Dodge Challenger vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1972 Dodge Challenger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Dodge Challenger (241 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 975 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Dodge Challenger | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Challenger | Elan |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5562 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 241 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2240 mm |
