1972 Dodge Challenger vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 435 kg more than 1972 Dodge Challenger.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Challenger | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Challenger | Challenger |
Year Released | 1972 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 2835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2730 mm |