1972 Dodge Challenger vs. 1997 Honda Integra
To start off, 1997 Honda Integra is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Honda Integra (176 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1972 Dodge Challenger. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1972 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 146 kg more than 1997 Honda Integra.
Because 1972 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Challenger | 1997 Honda Integra | |
Make | Dodge | Honda |
Model | Challenger | Integra |
Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4525 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1325 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2620 mm |