1972 Dodge Challenger vs. 1997 Mazda SW-X
To start off, 1997 Mazda SW-X is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Challenger would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 240 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Because 1972 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Challenger | 1997 Mazda SW-X | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Challenger | SW-X |
Year Released | 1972 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1105 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2620 mm |