1972 Dodge Challenger vs. 1999 Opel Omega
To start off, 1999 Opel Omega is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Dodge Challenger (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1999 Opel Omega. (100 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1999 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Opel Omega weights approximately 385 kg more than 1972 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Dodge Challenger (256 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Opel Omega. (209 Nm @ 1650 RPM). This means 1972 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Challenger | 1999 Opel Omega | |
Make | Dodge | Opel |
Model | Challenger | Omega |
Year Released | 1972 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 256 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2740 mm |