1972 Dodge Challenger vs. 2000 Mahindra Commander
To start off, 2000 Mahindra Commander is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 5 kg more than 2000 Mahindra Commander.
Because 2000 Mahindra Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Dodge Challenger | 2000 Mahindra Commander | |
| Make | Dodge | Mahindra |
| Model | Challenger | Commander |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5208 cc | 2112 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2690 mm |
