1972 Dodge Challenger vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 626 weights approximately 11 kg more than 1972 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2000 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Challenger | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Challenger | 626 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 2496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2620 mm |