1972 Dodge Challenger vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 495 kg more than 1972 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Challenger | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Challenger | Ranger |
Year Released | 1972 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3010 mm |