1972 Dodge Challenger vs. 2005 Land Rover Defender
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Defender is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 653 kg more than 1972 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2005 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Dodge Challenger (401 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Land Rover Defender. (300 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 1972 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Land Rover Defender.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Challenger | 2005 Land Rover Defender | |
Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
Model | Challenger | Defender |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5562 cc | 2498 cc |
Horse Power | 241 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 401 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102.6 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 2058 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2890 mm |