1972 Dodge Challenger vs. 2006 Land Rover Discovery
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Discovery weights approximately 25 kg more than 1972 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2006 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Challenger | 2006 Land Rover Discovery | |
Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
Model | Challenger | Discovery |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 2720 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2890 mm |