1972 Dodge Challenger vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1972 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Challenger | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Challenger | 5 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 157 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2760 mm |