1972 Dodge Challenger vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1972 Dodge Challenger. (241 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1972 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Dodge Challenger (401 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 1972 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Challenger | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Challenger | UTE |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5562 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 241 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 401 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |