1972 Dodge Challenger vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Dodge Challenger (241 HP) has 103 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Because 1972 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Dodge Challenger (401 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 1972 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Challenger | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Challenger | Cruze |
Year Released | 1972 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5562 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 241 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 401 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2685 mm |