1972 Dodge Charger vs. 1995 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1995 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Charger weights approximately 90 kg more than 1995 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Charger | 1995 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Charger | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1972 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6555 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 5050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2880 mm |