1972 Dodge Charger vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 700 kg more than 1972 Dodge Charger.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Dodge Charger. (470 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Charger | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Charger | Commander |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6555 cc | 2987 cc |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 470 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 110.2 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.9 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 2410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 2270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2790 mm |