1972 Dodge Dart vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda CR-V is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Dart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Dart would be higher. At 5,563 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Dart is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda CR-V weights approximately 83 kg more than 1972 Dodge Dart.
Because 2003 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Dodge Dart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1972 Dodge Dart has manual transmission. 1972 Dodge Dart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Dodge Dart | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Dodge | Honda |
| Model | Dart | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5563 cc | 2360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1518 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |
