1972 Dodge Dart vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Dart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Dart would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Dart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1972 Dodge Dart. (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1972 Dodge Dart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 105 kg more than 1972 Dodge Dart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Dodge Dart (401 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM). This means 1972 Dodge Dart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Dart | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Dart | Clio |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5562 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Torque | 401 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2850 mm |