1972 Dodge Dart vs. 2004 Ford Puma
To start off, 2004 Ford Puma is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Dart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Dart would be higher. At 5,563 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Dart is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Dart weights approximately 400 kg more than 2004 Ford Puma.
Because 1972 Dodge Dart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Dodge Dart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Dart | 2004 Ford Puma | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Dart | Puma |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5563 cc | 1678 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |