1972 Dodge Dart vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Dart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Dart would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Dart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Dodge Dart (150 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Dodge Dart should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Dart weights approximately 595 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Dodge Dart (359 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1972 Dodge Dart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Dodge Dart | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Dodge | MCC |
| Model | Dart | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 5210 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 1810 mm |
