1972 Dodge Monaco vs. 1970 AC 428

To start off, 1972 Dodge Monaco is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 AC 428. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 AC 428 would be higher. At 7,003 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 AC 428 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 AC 428 (298 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1972 Dodge Monaco. (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 AC 428 should accelerate faster than 1972 Dodge Monaco. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Monaco weights approximately 490 kg more than 1970 AC 428.

Let's talk about torque, 1970 AC 428 (640 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Dodge Monaco. (394 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1970 AC 428 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Dodge Monaco.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Dodge Monaco 1970 AC 428
Make Dodge AC
Model Monaco 428
Year Released 1972 1970
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5895 cc 7003 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 175 HP 298 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 394 Nm 640 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Vehicle Weight 1920 kg 1430 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 3110 mm 2450 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]