1972 Dodge Monaco vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Monaco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Monaco would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Monaco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Dodge Monaco (225 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2003 Volvo V50. (217 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Dodge Monaco should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Monaco weights approximately 555 kg more than 2003 Volvo V50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Dodge Monaco (478 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo V50. (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1972 Dodge Monaco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo V50.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Dodge Monaco | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Monaco | V50 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7206 cc | 2524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 478 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1980 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2720 mm |