1972 Dodge Monaco vs. 2007 Jeep Wrangler

To start off, 2007 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Monaco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Monaco would be higher. At 5,895 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Monaco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 175 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Monaco weights approximately 350 kg more than 2007 Jeep Wrangler.

Let's talk about torque, 1972 Dodge Monaco (394 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Jeep Wrangler. (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1972 Dodge Monaco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Jeep Wrangler.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Dodge Monaco 2007 Jeep Wrangler
Make Dodge Jeep
Model Monaco Wrangler
Year Released 1972 2007
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5895 cc 3958 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 175 HP 175 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 394 Nm 296 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Vehicle Weight 1920 kg 1570 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 3890 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 3110 mm 2380 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]