1972 Dodge Monaco vs. 2013 BMW X1

To start off, 2013 BMW X1 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Dodge Monaco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Dodge Monaco would be higher. At 5,895 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Monaco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X1 (238 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1972 Dodge Monaco. (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X1 should accelerate faster than 1972 Dodge Monaco. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Dodge Monaco weights approximately 230 kg more than 2013 BMW X1.

Let's talk about torque, 1972 Dodge Monaco (394 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 BMW X1. (350 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1972 Dodge Monaco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 BMW X1.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Dodge Monaco 2013 BMW X1
Make Dodge BMW
Model Monaco X1
Year Released 1972 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5895 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 175 HP 238 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 394 Nm 350 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Vehicle Weight 1920 kg 1690 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 4484 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 2044 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1545 mm
Wheelbase Size 3110 mm 2760 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]