1972 Fiat 124 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Fiat 124. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Fiat 124 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 616 kg more than 1972 Fiat 124.
Because 1972 Fiat 124 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Fiat 124. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1972 Fiat 124 has manual transmission. 1972 Fiat 124 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Fiat 124 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
Model | 124 | BLS |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1592 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 176 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1566 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2680 mm |