1972 Fiat 128 vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Fiat 128. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Fiat 128 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1972 Fiat 128. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1972 Fiat 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 770 kg more than 1972 Fiat 128. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Fiat 128. (95 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Fiat 128.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Fiat 128 | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
Model | 128 | CTS |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 95 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 83.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 79.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3820 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2890 mm |