1972 Fiat 850 vs. 2003 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2003 Toyota Mark II is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Fiat 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Fiat 850 would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Mark II (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1972 Fiat 850. (51 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1972 Fiat 850.
Because 2003 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Fiat 850. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Mark II (200 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Fiat 850. (69 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Fiat 850.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Fiat 850 | 2003 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | 850 | Mark II |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 847 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2800 mm |