1972 Fiat X1-9 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Fiat X1-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Fiat X1-9 would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Fiat X1-9 (74 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Fiat X1-9 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1972 Fiat X1-9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Fiat X1-9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Renault Clio (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Fiat X1-9. (98 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1998 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Fiat X1-9.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Fiat X1-9 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Fiat | Renault |
| Model | X1-9 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1783 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 98 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 21.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 164 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 50 L |
