1972 Fiat X1-9 vs. 1999 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1999 Mazda Midge is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Fiat X1-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Fiat X1-9 would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Fiat X1-9 (74 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1999 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Fiat X1-9 should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda Midge weights approximately 86 kg more than 1972 Fiat X1-9.
Because 1972 Fiat X1-9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Fiat X1-9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Fiat X1-9. (98 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1999 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Fiat X1-9.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Fiat X1-9 | 1999 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | X1-9 | Midge |
Year Released | 1972 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 98 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1400 mm |