1972 Fiat X1-9 vs. 2010 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2010 Renault Scenic is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Fiat X1-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Fiat X1-9 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Scenic (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1972 Fiat X1-9. (74 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1972 Fiat X1-9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Scenic weights approximately 335 kg more than 1972 Fiat X1-9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Fiat X1-9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Fiat X1-9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Scenic (191 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Fiat X1-9. (98 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Fiat X1-9. 2010 Renault Scenic has automatic transmission and 1972 Fiat X1-9 has manual transmission. 1972 Fiat X1-9 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Renault Scenic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Fiat X1-9 | 2010 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | Fiat | Renault |
| Model | X1-9 | Scenic |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 98 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1215 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 60 L |
