1972 Ford Cortina vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1972 Ford Cortina. (56 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Cortina.
Because 1972 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford Cortina. (91 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Cortina | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Cortina | Micra |
Year Released | 1972 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 91 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 46 L |