1972 Ford Fairlane vs. 2006 Nissan 1400

To start off, 2006 Nissan 1400 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Fairlane (153 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2006 Nissan 1400. (63 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan 1400 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1972 Ford Fairlane.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Fairlane (326 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan 1400. (97 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1972 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan 1400.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Ford Fairlane 2006 Nissan 1400
Make Ford Nissan
Model Fairlane 1400
Year Released 1972 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4097 cc 1397 cc
Horse Power 153 HP 63 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 326 Nm 97 Nm
Torque RPM 1600 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 93.5 mm 76 mm
Engine Stroke Size 99.3 mm 77 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 3 seats
Vehicle Weight 1450 kg 1575 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 5700 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2310 mm