1972 Ford Fairlane vs. 2006 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2006 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1972 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki SX4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Fairlane (326 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Suzuki SX4. (184 Nm). This means 1972 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Suzuki SX4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Ford Fairlane | 2006 Suzuki SX4 | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Fairlane | SX4 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4097 cc | 1995 cc |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1790 mm |
