1972 Ford Gran Torino vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1972 Ford Gran Torino is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,095 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Ford Gran Torino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Gran Torino (97 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Gran Torino should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Gran Torino weights approximately 475 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Gran Torino (245 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 Ford Gran Torino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Gran Torino | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Gran Torino | 2000 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4095 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 64 L |