1972 Ford Gran Torino vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Gran Torino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Gran Torino would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Ford Gran Torino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1972 Ford Gran Torino. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Gran Torino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Gran Torino weights approximately 388 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Gran Torino (245 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 1972 Ford Gran Torino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Gran Torino | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Gran Torino | Outlander |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 2374 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1858 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 59 L |