1972 Ford Gran Torino vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Gran Torino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Gran Torino would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1972 Ford Gran Torino. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Gran Torino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 593 kg more than 1972 Ford Gran Torino. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford Gran Torino. (245 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford Gran Torino.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford Gran Torino | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Gran Torino | Armada |
Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4095 cc | 5555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.6 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1681 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5370 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 106 L |