1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1972 Ford GT 40 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Ford GT 40 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | GT 40 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2700 mm |
