1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 1964 Holden EJ
To start off, 1972 Ford GT 40 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EJ weights approximately 170 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EJ (163 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Ford GT 40 | 1964 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | GT 40 | EJ |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2680 mm |
