1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 1972 Ford GT 40 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 145. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Volvo 145 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Volvo 145 (153 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1968 Volvo 145 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford GT 40 | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | GT 40 | 145 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 153 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 84.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 45 L |