1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 1971 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1972 Ford GT 40 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1971 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Mazda RX-2 (158 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1971 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Ford GT 40 | 1971 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | GT 40 | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2480 mm |
