1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 1976 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1976 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1976 Nissan Bluebird. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1976 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Nissan Bluebird (135 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1976 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford GT 40 | 1976 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | GT 40 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1972 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 135 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2510 mm |