1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 1979 Audi Fox
To start off, 1979 Audi Fox is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1979 Audi Fox.
Because 1972 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Audi Fox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Ford GT 40 | 1979 Audi Fox | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | GT 40 | Fox |
Year Released | 1972 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1271 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 980 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2550 mm |