1972 Ford GT 40 vs. 1981 Zastava 102

To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford GT 40 (85 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (78 Nm). This means 1972 Ford GT 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.

Compare all specifications: